If you’re a parent who has ever felt cornered into signing a school form without really being told you could refuse — this update is for you.

On 20 July 2026, the Supreme Court of India passed an important order that affects every parent whose child has been asked to enrol for an APAAR ID. In simple terms: the consent form your school gives you must now allow you to say no, and this rule applies across the entire country.

Let’s break down what happened, why it matters, and what it means for you as a parent.

What is APAAR, and why should you care?

Back in 2023, the Ministry of Education (MoE), along with the Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY), rolled out the Automated Permanent Academic Account Registry — APAAR for short. The idea was a “one student, one ID” system, linking your child’s Aadhaar number to a lifelong digital record of their academic scores, achievements, and other data.

To enrol a child, parents were asked to sign a “model consent form.” On paper, this sounds fine — consent is supposed to mean you have a real choice. The problem was that this form never actually gave parents the option to refuse. Schools across the country used a version that only asked you to agree, with no box to tick if you didn’t want to participate.

Many parents reported they weren’t even told they had a choice in the matter — they simply signed because the school told them to.

The Odisha case that started it all

A parent named Rohit Anand Das challenged this before the Odisha High Court in February 2025, specifically objecting to the missing opt-out option. On 12 December 2025, the Odisha High Court ruled in his favour in Rohit Anand Das v. State of Odisha, W.P. (C) No. 8285 of 2025, and directed the State authorities to consider amending the model consent form to include an option to refuse or opt out.

That was a good result — but it only bound authorities in Odisha.

How it became a pan-India rule

The story didn’t end there. In July 2026, a separate writ petition was filed before the Supreme Court itself, under Article 32 of the Constitution, by Abishek Baxi and other parents of children studying in CBSE-affiliated schools. Their case went further — they argued that the entire APAAR Scheme, as it was being implemented, functioned like a “State-run surveillance mechanism,” allowing long-term tracking and profiling of children’s educational lives.

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for the petitioners, made a few important points:

  • The original 2023 circular said parental consent was required — but the consent form itself gave no way to decline.
  • The form didn’t clearly explain the purpose of data collection, how long the data would be kept, or who it would be shared with.
  • CBSE circulars issued in August 2025 had made getting an APAAR ID mandatory for Class IX to XII students to even register for Board exams from 2026 onwards.

Her argument was straightforward: if you’re told your child can’t sit for board exams without an APAAR ID, “consent” stops being real consent — it becomes compulsion. She also relied on the Supreme Court’s landmark privacy judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1, arguing that this setup failed the tests of legality, legitimate aim, necessity, and proportionality that any State action touching the right to privacy must meet.

The Bench — Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana — agreed with the approach the Odisha High Court had already taken. Rather than starting from scratch, the Supreme Court simply extended Odisha’s solution to the whole country. It directed that the directions in Paragraph 19 of the Odisha High Court’s judgment — requiring a proper opt-out option in the consent form — “shall be given effect to on a pan-India basis by the concerned authorities implementing the APAAR Scheme.”

The data protection angle

The Supreme Court didn’t stop at the consent form. It also made it clear that any data collected under APAAR must strictly comply with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 — meaning the government bodies handling this data are bound by the same lawful, secure, and purpose-limited processing obligations that apply to any data fiduciary.

Just as importantly, the Court stated that no personal information collected through APAAR can be shared with any private entity or third party except as strictly authorised by law. Any sharing beyond the Scheme’s stated purpose was called impermissible.

What this actually means for you

  • You now have a clear, court-backed right to say no to your child’s APAAR ID enrolment — anywhere in India, not just Odisha.
  • Schools cannot treat APAAR ID as a mandatory precondition without offering a genuine opt-out.
  • Any data collected must be handled under the DPDP Act, 2023 — with restrictions on retention, purpose, and third-party sharing.
  • The Respondents (Union of India, MeitY, CBSE, and UIDAI) have been given liberty to seek clarifications, so the exact wording of the revised consent form is still to come.

What to watch for next

The Ministry of Education still needs to actually amend the model consent form to build in the opt-out option the courts have directed. Until that happens, if your child’s school hands you the old form, you have a strong legal basis to ask for the option to refuse, or to flag the school for non-compliance with the Supreme Court’s order.

This article is for general awareness and does not constitute legal advice. If your child’s school is denying you the option to opt out of APAAR ID enrolment, or is linking it to exam eligibility, you may want to consult a lawyer about your specific situation.

Recent Posts